A case study on argumentation based teaching

Keywords: Argumentation based teaching,, argumentation, instructional design

Abstract

This qualitative single holistic case study is the analysis of students’ views and experiences during the argumentation based teaching process which can potentially provide insights on developing further argumentation based teaching designs. The participants of this study were fourteen students at 11th grade at a state school in the Marmara Region. The data were gathered through semi-structured interview form and teaching journal. In this study, it was determined that the opinions of participants about argumentation based teaching were generally positive. They mainly described argumentation based learning as fun and effective and that it enabled them to learn without having to memorize. On the other hand, the inadequacey of the duration of the lessons and some conflicts among the students have been noted as the negative aspects by the participants.This qualitative single holistic case study is the analysis of students’ views and experiences during the argumentation based teaching process which can potentially provide insights on developing further argumentation based teaching designs. The participants of this study were fourteen students at 11th grade at a state school in the Marmara Region. The data were gathered through semi-structured interview form and teaching journal. In this study, it was determined that the opinions of participants about argumentation based teaching were generally positive. They mainly described argumentation based learning as fun and effective and that it enabled them to learn without having to memorize. On the other hand, the inadequacey of the duration of the lessons and some conflicts among the students have been noted as the negative aspects by the participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktamış, H., & Atmaca, A. C. (2016). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının argümantasyon tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımına yönelik görüşleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(58), 936-947.

Andrews, R. (2015). Critical thinking and/or argumentation in higher education. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds), The palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp.49-62). Palgrave Macmillan.

Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–460). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Balcı, C., & Yenice, N. (2016). Effects of the scientific argumentation-based learning process on teaching the unit of cell division and inheritance to eighth grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 2(1), 67-84.

Baydaş, Ö., Yeşildağ Hasançebi, F., & Kilis, S. (2018). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımında üniversite öğrencilerinin tartışma süreçlerinin incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 564-581.

Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (8), 797-817.

Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology-based issues. Science Education, 87, 352–377.

Bonnett, A. (2008). What is geography? London: Sage.

Burke, K. A., Greenbowe T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1032-1038.

Campos, E., Silva, L., Tecpan, S. & Zavala, G. (2016). Argumentation during active learning strategies in a SCALE-UP environment. In Ding, J. (Ed.) Physics Education Research Conference Proceeding (pp. 64-67). California: Sacramento.

Chen, C. H., & She, C. (2012). The impact of recurrent online synchronous scientific argumentation on students’ argumentation and conceptual change. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 197-210.

Choi, A., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2014). Grade 5 students’ online argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 267-287.

Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 837-861.

Crowell, A.\ & Kuhn, D. (2012). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A three-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363-381.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312.

Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.

Felton, M. (2005). Thinking classroom. Washington, 6(4), 6-13.

Fisher, A. (2004). The logic of real argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2013). Argumentation and debate, critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10-18.

Grbovic, S. M., Dragonic, M. J. (2017). Student centered factors of geography teaching from the students’ perspective. Nastava i vaspitanje, 66(3), 527-546.

Hicks, D. (2007). Lessons for the future: A geographical contribution. Geography, 82, 179–188

Jonassen, D., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 58(4), 439-457.

Kabataş Memiş, E. (2014). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımı uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(2), 401-418.

Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Çetin, P. S. (2010). High School students’ perceptions of Argumentation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3971-3975.

Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1065-1084.

King, P. M. (2000). Learning to make reflective judgments. In M. B. Baxter Magolda (Ed.), Linking student development, learning, and teaching: New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 82, pp. 15–26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kıngır, S., Geban, Ö., & Günel, M. (2011). Öğrencilerin kimya derslerinde argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımın uygulanmasına yönelik görüşleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 15-28.

Kolsto, S. D. (2004). Students’ argumentation: Knowledge, values and decisions. In E. K. Henriksen & M. Odegaard (Eds.), Naturfagenes didaktikk—en disciplin iforandring? Det7. nordiske forskersymposiet om undervisning i naturfag i skolen (pp. 63–78). Kristiansand, Norway: Hoyskoleforlaget AS.

Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451.

Lazaro, D. (2010). Learning to TAP: An effort to scaffold students’ argumentation in science. In G. Çakmakçı, & M.F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: scientific literacy and social aspects of science, a collection of papers presented at ESERA 2009 conference (pp.43-50). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 17-38.

Maude, A. (2010). What does geography contribute to the education of young Australians? Geographical Education, 23, 14-22.

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

Noroozia, O., Weinbergerb, A., Harm, B., Muldera, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning: A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7, 79–106.

Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M. & Owens, M. C. (2012). The two faces of scientific argumentation: Applications to global climate change. In M.S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research (pp. 17-37). Dordrecht: Springer.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 41(10), 994-1020

Simon, S., & Johnson, S. (2008). Professional learning portfolios for argumentation in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 669-688.

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260.

Tezel, Ö., Yılmaz, G. (2017). Türkiye’de argümantasyona dayalı fen bilimleri öğretimi çalışmalarından bir derleme. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 146-160.

Torun, F., Şahin, S. (2016). Determination of students' argument levels in argumentation-based social studies course. Education and Science, 41(186), 233-251.

Toulmin, S. (1964). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (2001), Return to reason, Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977.

Voss, J. F., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Argumentation in psychology: Background comments. Discourse Processes, 32(3), 89–111.

Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Lower track science students' argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807-838.

Yıldız, K., & Ünal, Ş. (2016). Biyoloji dersi çevre konularının öğretiminde örnek olay inceleme ve argümantasyon yöntemlerinin etkisi. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1),25-51.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293-312.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
How to Cite
Gencel, İlke, & Ilıman, M. (2019). A case study on argumentation based teaching. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları Ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2019.003