Evaluation of teaching principles and methods course developed with a school-based approach

  • Melis Yeşilpınar Uyar
  • Ahmet Doğanay
Keywords: Case study, school-based curriculum development, participatory evaluation model, teacher education

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a Teaching Principles and Methods course which was developed with a school-based approach. The study was designed as a case study. The participants of the study include one of the researchers who taught the course and 36 sophomore students who were enrolled in the course at the Department of Classroom Teaching at a state university. Observations, interviews, and document analysis were used to collect data. Inductive and deductive content analysis methods were used for data analysis. Consequently, it was concluded that the curriculum which was developed with a school-based approach for the teaching principles and methods course largely was in line with the requirements arising in the context of the current situation, provided students with personal and professional gains, and was implementable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Açıkgöz, Ö. (2012). Yükseköğretim üzerine bir değerlendirme. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 2, 11-17. Akrom, M. A. (2015). The mirage of curriculum decentralization: A case study of local stakeholders’ involve-

ment in school-based curriculum development (SBCD) policy implementation in Indonesia. Unpublis-

hed doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, USA.

Aremu, A., & Salami, I. A. (2013). Preparation of primary teachers in pupil-centred activity-based mathematics instructions and its model. European Scientific Journal, 9(19). 356-371.

Bacevich, A. E. (2010). Building curriculum for teacher education: A study of video records of practice. Un- published doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, USA.

Bay, E. (2008). Öğretmen eğitiminde yapılandırmacı program uygulamalarının etkililiğinin değerlen- dirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.

Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R.,Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207.

Burke, B. (1998). Evaluating for a change: Reflections on participatory methodology. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 43-56.

Caires, S., & Almeida, L. S. (2005). Teaching practice in Initial Teacher Education: Its impact on student teachers’ professional skills and development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31 (2), 111-120.

Chun, L. Y. (1999). School-based curriculum development: The Hong Kong experience. The Curricu- lum Journal, 10(3), 419-442.

Colet, N. R., & Durand, N. (2004). Working on the Bologna Declaration: Promoting intergrated curri- culum development and fostering conceptual change. International Journal for Academic Deve- lopment, 9(2), 167-179.

Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (2004). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies of evaluation use and organizational learning. In J. B. Cousins & L. M. Earl (Eds.), The case for participatory evaluation: Theory, research, practice (pp. 3-19). Routledge. London: The Falmer Press.

Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New directions for evaluati- on, 80, 5-23.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantative and qualitative research (3nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Dilekmen, M., Başçı, Z. ve Bektaş, F. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin iletişim becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 223-231.

Elliott, J. (1993). What we learned from action research in school-based evaluation. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 175-186.

Erdamar, G. K. ve Demirel, H. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının grup çalışmalarına ilişkin algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 205-223.

Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Berg, R. V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions fostering the implementa- tion of large-scale innovation programs in schools: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Admi- nistration Quarterly, 37(1), 130-166.

Gibson, H. L., & Van Strat, G. A. (2000). The impact of instructional methods on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward teaching and learning, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educati- onal Research Association, New Orleans.

Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementa- tion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933-940.

Girgin, G., Çetingöz, D. ve Vural, D. E. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal beceri düzeylerinin ince- lenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4(1), 38-49.





Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.

Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine Publishing Company.

Gough, R. G. (1977) Curriculum development and teacher education. British Journal of In-Service Edu- cation, 3(3), 217-219.

Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ERIC/ECTJ An- nual Review Paper, 29(2), 75-91.

Güneş, F. (2012). Bologna süreci işe yükseköğretimde öngörülen beceri ve yetkinlikler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 2(1), 1-9.

Güney, K. ve Semerci, Ç. (2009). Mikro-yansıtıcı öğretim yönteminin öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünmesine etkisi. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 77-83.

İlter, İ. (2014). Öğretim elemanlarının kullandığı yöntem ve tekniklere ilişkin öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(35), 562-575.

Juang, Y. R., Liu, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2008). Computer-supported teacher development of pedagogi- cal content knowledge through developing school-based curriculum. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 149-170.

Kara, D. A. ve Sağlam, M. (2014). Öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerinin öğrenme-öğretme sürecine yönelik yeterlikleri kazandırması yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(3), 28-86.

Keiny, S. (1993). School-based curriculum development as a process of teachers’ Professional develop- ment. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 65-93.

Law, E. (2001). Impacts of a school based curriculum project on teachers and students: A Hong Kong case study. Retrieved November 9, 2014 from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/2001_im- pacts_of_a_school_based_curric.pdf.

Lewy, A. (1991). National and school-based curriculum development. Unesco: International insttitute for educational plannig.

Li, H. (2006). School-based curriculum development: An interview study of Chinese kindergartens.

Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 223-229.

Main, K. (2007). A year longs study of the formation and development of middle years’ teaching teams. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Australia.

Main, K. (2010). Teamwork—teach me, teach me not: A case study of three Australian preservice teac- hers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(3), 77-93.

Maphosa, C., & Mutopa, S. (2012). Teachers’ awareness of their role in planning and implementing school-based curriculum innovation. Anthropologist, 14(2), 99-106.

Marsh, C., Christopher, D., Lynne, G., & Gail, M. (1990). Reconceptionalizm school-based curriculum de- velopment. London: The Palmer Press.

McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: Process theory, pedagogy and action research. Newyork: Routledge.

Mentkowski, M., Rogers, G., Doherty, A., Loacker, G., Hart, J. R., Rickards, W., & Diez, M. (2002). Le- arning that lasts: Integrating learning, development, and performance in college and beyond. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 660-666.

Minger, M. A., & Simpson, P. (2006). The impact of a standards-based science course for preservice elementary teachers on teacher attitudes toward science teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), 49-60.

Molina, R., Fernandez, M. L., & Nisbet, L. (2013). Analyzing elementary preservice teachers’ development of content and pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics through microteaching lesson study. Paper presented the Tenth Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference, Florida International University, Miami.





National Council for the Social Studies [NCSS]. (1992). A vision of powerful teaching and learning in the social studies. Building social understanding and civic efficacy. Position statement. Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50, 8–12.

Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies: A rationale for the assess- ment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41-56.

Nutravong, R. (2002). School based curriculum decision-making: A study of the Thailand reform experiment.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506-517.

Özyurt, M. (2015). İlkokul üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf değer eğitimi programının geliştirilmesinde okul temelli yaklaşımın etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2008). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 47-58.

Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. N. (2006). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers (7 th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Priestley, M., Minty, S., & Eager, M. (2014). School-based curriculum development in Scotland: Curri- culum policy and enactment. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(2), 189–211.

Ralph, E. G. (2014). The effectiveness of microteaching: Five years’ findings. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1, 17-28.

Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2004). Students’ special needs and prob- lems as reasons for the adaptation of substance abuse prevention curricula in the nation’s middle schools. Prevention Science, 5, 197–206.

Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2010). Collaborative learning in pre-service teacher educati- on: an exploratory study on related conceptions, self-efficacy and implementation. Educational Studies, 36(5), 537-553.

Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133-145.

Shawer, S. F. (2009). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 173-184.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educati- on for Information, 22, 63–75.

Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London: Harper and Row.

Strawitz, B. M., & Malone, M. R. (1984). The influence of field experiences on stages of concern and attitudes of preservice teachers toward science and science teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.

Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teac- her education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psycho- logy, 83(3), 467-483.

Talsma, V. L. (1996). Science autobiographies: What so they tell us about preservice elementary teachers’ attitu- des towards science and science teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis.





Tan, Ş. (2010). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri dersinde öğrencilerin akademik başarılarının yordanması.

Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 239-266.

Taşkın, Ş. Ç. ve Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2009, Mayıs). Öğretmen adaylarının meslek bilgisi dersleri üzerine bakış açıları. I. Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi’nde sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.

Westbury, I., Hansen, S. E., Kansanen, P. & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475-485.

White, F., Lloyd, H., Kennedy, G., & Stewart, C. (2005). An investigation of undergraduate students’ fee- lings and attitudes towards group work and group assessment. Retrieved November 1, 2015 from Http:// Conference.Herdsa.Org.Au/2005/Pdf/Refereed/Paper_250.Pdf.

Wolf, P. (2007). A model for faculating curriculum development in higher education: A faculty-dri- ven, data informed, and educational developer-supported approach. New Directions for Teac- hing and Learning, 112, 15-20.

Wolfe, A. (2012). Implementing collaborative learning methods in the political science classroom. Jo- urnal of Political Science Education, 8(4), 420-432.

Wright, C. R., & Johnson, J. T. (2000). Curriculum practice. Canada: Grant MacEwan College.

Xu, Y. (2009). School-based teacher development through a school-university collaborative project: A case study of a recent initiative in China. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(1), 49-66.

Yeşilpınar-Uyar, M. (2016). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri dersine yönelik okul temelli öğretim programı geliştirmeye ilişkin bir ihtiyaç analizi çalışması. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(1), 73-96.

Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7.bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (1998). Eğitim fakülteleri öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının yeniden dü- zenlenmesi. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Yayını.

Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (2010a). Türkiye yükseköğretim yeterlilikler çerçevesi (TYYÇ). 10.09.2014 tarihinde http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/?pid=20 adresinden alınmıştır.

Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (2010b). Yükseköğretimde yeniden yapılanma: 66 Soruda Bologna süreci uygulamaları. 10. 09. 2014 tarihinde http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/30217/yuksekogretim- de_yeniden_yapilanma_66_soruda_bologna_2010.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

Yüksel, G. (1997). Sosyal beceri eğitiminin üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal beceri düzeylerine etkisi.

Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(11), 37-47.

Yüksel, İ. ve Sağlam, M. (2012). Eğitimde program değerlendirme (1. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Ya- yıncılık.

Yüksel, S. (1998). Okula dayalı program geliştirme. Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(16), 513-525.

Zeegers, Y. (2012). Curriculum development for teacher education in the Southern Philippines: A si- multaneous process of professional learning and syllabus enhancement. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 207-213.

Zukoski, A., & Luluquisen, M. (2002). Participatory evaluation: What is it? Why do it? What are the challenges. Policy and Practice, 5, 3-8.
How to Cite
Yeşilpınar Uyar, M., & Doğanay, A. (2017). Evaluation of teaching principles and methods course developed with a school-based approach. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları Ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(14), 63-88.