A Systematic Review of Postgraduate Theses on Curriculum Evaluation

Keywords: curriculum evaluation, post graduate education, postgraduate thesis

Abstract

Curriculum evaluation is a process carried out to decide the effectiveness of training programs. In this process, the strengths and aspects of the training programs that are open to improvement are emphasized. Therefore, curriculum evaluation studies are an important part of curriculum development. In this respect, it is important to consider the research studies on curriculum evaluation studies together in order to develop curriculum. This study aims to review the postgraduate theses completed on the evaluation of curricula in Turkey between 2007 and 2019 according to several variables and to determine the research trend in this field. The method of the research was formed by systematic review. In this context, 586 postgraduate theses written on curriculum evaluation were reviewed. It was determined that the theses showed a balanced distribution according to years and were generally at master’s level. The postgraduate theses were mainly based on quantitative research methods, and in recent years, there has been a tendency towards qualitative and mixed-method studies. Questionnaires and interviews were used in the theses mostly prepared in accordance with the survey model and the data were collected from teachers and students. In the one-fifth of the theses on the evaluation of curricula which were examined within the scope of this research (105 theses), it was determined that curriculum evaluation models were taken into consideration and that the most preferred model was Stufflebeam’s CIPP model. Following this model, Erden’s "Element-Oriented Curriculum Evaluation Model" and Tyler’s "Objective-Centered Evaluation Model" were also preferred frequently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akşan, E. & Baki, A. (2017). Content analysis of curriculum-related studies in Turkey between 2000 and 2014. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 877–904.Doi:10.12738/estp.2017.3.0002

Aslan, M. & Sağlam, M. (2017). Methodological investigation of the curriculum evaluation theses completed between the years 2006-2015 in Turkey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1468-1478. Doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050904

Ayaz, M. F., Oral, B. & Söylemez, M. (2015). Evaluation of postgraduate theses on teacher training in Turkey. Primary Education Online, 14(2), 787-802. Doi:10.17051/io.2015.89009

Aygören, F. & Er, K. O. (2018). Curriculum evaluation in education. Ankara: Pegem.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. Doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Developing a questionnaire. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 3(2), 133-151. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/256394

Christensen, L. B., Burke Johnson, R.& Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. Essex: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Design and implementation of mixed method research. (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.), Ankara: Anı.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative research methods: qualitative research and research design by five approaches. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Siyasal.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics as qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Çelenk, S., Tertemiz, N., & Kalaycı, N. (2000). Primary school curriculums and developments. Ankara: Nobel.

Dündar, E. & Merç, A. (2017). A critical review of research on curriculum development and evaluation in ELT. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2(1), 136-168.Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.437574

Eğmir, E., Erdem, C. & Koçyiğit, M. (2017). Trends in educational research: a content analysis of the studies published in international journal of instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 277-294.Doi: 10.12973/iji.2017.10318a

Eskici, M. & Çayak, S. (2017). A general overview of postgraduate theses in department of educational sciences. Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1), 211-226. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/336915

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education.

Forster, N. (1995). The analysis of company documentation. (C. Cassell & G. Symon, Eds). Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. London: Sage.

Gökmenoğlu, T. (2014). Broad perspective: curriculum evaluation studies in Turkey in terms of models and approaches. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 4(7), 54-70. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271394842_Genis_Aci_Modeller_ve_Yaklasimlar_Acisindan_Turkiye'de_Program_Degerlendirme_Calismalari_The_Wide_Angle_Program_Evaluation_Studies_in_Turkey_in_Terms_of_Models_and_Approaches

Gömleksiz, M. N. &Bozpolat, E. (2013). Evaluation of postgraduate theses in the field of curriculum and instruction. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(7), 457-472. Doi: 10.9761/JASSS1769

Hazır-Bıkmaz, F., Aksoy, E., Tatar, Ö. & Atak Altınyüzük, C. (2013). Content analysis for the PhD dissertations in the field of curriculum and instruction (1974-2009). Education and Science, 38(168), 288-303. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1627/596

Karakoç, B., Özpolat, E.T. & Kara, K. (2018). Evaluation of postgraduate theses on teacher training in Turkey (1987-2017). Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 12(24), 313-333. Doi: /10.29329/mjer.2018.147.17

Kozikoğlu, İ. & Senemoğlu, N. (2016). Content analysis of the PhD dissertations in the field of curriculum and instruction (2009-2014). Education and Science, 40(182), 29-41. Doi: 10.15390/EB.2015.4784

Kurt, A. & Erdoğan, M. (2015). Content analysis of the studies on curriculum evaluation and research trends; from 2004 to 2013. Education and Science, 40(178), 199-224. Doi:10.15390/EB.2015.4167

Küçükahmet, L. (1997). Curriculum and instruction. Ankara: Gazi Bookhouse.

Küçükoğlu, A. & Ozan, C. (2013). A content analysis for the postgraduate theses in elementary school teaching. International Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 4(12), 27-47. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335444631_Sinif_Ogretmenligi_Alanindaki_Lisansustu_Tezlere_Yonelik_Bir_Icerik_Analizi

Özsoy, G., Bayrak Özmutlu, E. & Gündüz, S. N. (2017). Evaluation of research trends in primary school mathematics education based on the postgraduate theses. ODU Journal of Social Sciences Research, 7(2), 199-219. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/odusobiad/issue/30252/327132

Özüdoğru, F. (2018). Analysis of curriculum evaluation studies conducted in foreign language education: 2005-2016. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 113-134. Retrieved from https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/660/375

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (M. Bütün & S. Beşir Demir, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem.

Schreglmann, S. (2016). Content analysis of the postgraduate and doctoral theses completed on curriculum development in Turkey. Journal of International Social Research, 9(43), 1492-1500. Doi: 10.17719/jisr.20164317720

Stufflebeam, D. L. & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Şahin, D., Calp, Ş., Bulut, P. & Kuşdemir, Y. (2013). Evaluation of postgraduate theses in the field of classroom teaching education in terms of various criteria. Zeitschriftfür die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 5(3), 187-205. Retrieved from http://dieweltdertuerken.org/index.php/ZfWT/article/viewFile/515/sahin_calp

Uysal, S. (2016). Research trends in curriculum and instruction in Turkey between 2014 and 2016. Selçuk University Journal of Social and Technical Research, 12, 220-231. Retrieved from http://sosyoteknik.selcuk.edu.tr/sustad/article/view/96

Wolf, R. M. (1988). Questionnaire, educational research methodology and measurement (P. S. Keeves, Ed.). Oxford: Pergaman.

Yetkiner, A., Acar Erdol, T. & Ünlü, Ş. (2019). Content analysis of PhD dissertations on curriculum evaluation (1996-2017). Erzincan University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(1), 247-269.Doi: 10.17556/erziefd.443298

Yıldırım, A. (1999). The key features of qualitative research methods and their place and importance in educational research. Education and Science, 23(112), 7-17. Retrieved from http://eb.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/5326/1485

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin.

Yin, R. K. (2015). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

YÖK [CoHE] (2019). Higher education statistics. Retrieved fromhttps://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/

Yüksel, İ. & Sağlam, M. (2012). Curriculum evaluation in education. Ankara: Pegem.
How to Cite
Taş, İlkay, & Duman, S. N. (2021). A Systematic Review of Postgraduate Theses on Curriculum Evaluation. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları Ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2021.003