Investigation of Ethnopedagogical Factors in Teacher Education: Kyrgyzstan Sample
The purpose of this study is to investigate the ethnopedagogy education in the teacher education programs in Kyrgyzstan. Basic qualitative research method was applied in the study. The data were collected through document review and interviews with graduate students from Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University and instructors. The researcher stayed in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan for 50 days to collect the data, the documents and to plan and conduct the interviews. The data collected via document review and interviews, were analyzed by content analysis method. As a result of the analysis, information about the ethnopedagogy class at Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University teacher education program was reviewed and the instructors’ opinions about ethnopedagogy education at teacher education programs and the graduate students’ opinions about the ethnopedagogy class were identified. The most important result can be seen as that instructors and students give great importance to ethnopedagogy and adopt its ideas. They also indicated further insight and concrete proposals. As a country with a deep and rich history, it would be a great chance for Turkey to benefit from this educational experience.
Alimbekov, A. (2007). Etnopedagoji̇ ve Kırgız etnopedagojisinin temel kavramları. Türk Yurdu, 27 (242), 31-36.
Alimbekov, A. (2012). Kyrgyz ethnopedagogy: student book for higher and secondary educational institutions providing pedagogical education. Bishkek.
Alimbekov, A. (2015). Kırgızistan'da öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının etnopedagojik yönden gelişimi. Uluslararası 3. Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi.
Anwar-Hafid, Amiruddin, Ketut-Suardika, Sartono ve Peribadi (2015). An analysis of kalosara function as ethnopedagogic media in nation character-building in south east Sulawesi. International Research Journal of Emerging Trends in Multidisciplinary. 1(9), 1-15.
Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. (2006). Söylev ve Demeçler. Ankara: ATAM.
Gashimov, A. Sh., & Sadigov, F.B. (1970). Azerbaycan halk pedagojisi. Bakü: Azer Nashr.
Khanbikov, J.I (1967). Tatar halkının eğitim düşünce tarihi. Kazan: Tatar Book Publishing.
Kuzmin, V.K., Krylov, D.A., Komelin, V.A., Kuzmin, N.V. (2014). Ethnopedagogical competence of teachers: criteria, indicators and level of development. Modern problems of science and education, (5), 102-109.
Latyshina, D. N., Khayrullin, P. Z. (2014). Etnopedagogika. Moskova.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shavadi, A. (2015). New information technologies in ethnopedagogical process. In Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), 9th International Conference, IEEE, 595-599.
Volkov, G. N. (1974). Etnopedagıgıka. Çeboksarı.
Volkov, G. N. (1958). Chuvash folk pedagogy. Cheboksary: Chuvashgosizdat.
Zaydullina, N. N. (2015). Role of labour education in the ethnopedagogics in the modern World. Young Scientist USA, 4, 29-31.