Problems and solutions in achieving learning outcomes of the 4th grade social studies curriculum

Keywords: Social studies, Learning outcomes, Curriculum

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes in which problems were encountered in terms of achievement and reveal these problems experienced in social studies instruction based on elementary school teachers’ views. The study was designed in accordance with the mixed research method. A questionnaire was firstly administered to the elementary school teachers, and then semi-structured interviews were conducted. In the light of the findings, it was revealed that elementary school teachers experienced problems regarding certain course outcomes. These outcomes included: “Students put themselves into the shoes of other individuals who have different characteristics.”, “Students make inferences about the location of a place in their environment.”, “Students do research about the inventors of the technological products they use and the development of these products in the course of time.”, “Students generate ideas for designing unique products based on the needs in their environment.” and “Students use the resources around them without wasting.”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akdağ, H. (2009). Sosyal bilgilerin tanımı, amacı, önemi ve Türkiye’deki yeri. R. Turan, A. M., Sünbül & H. Akdağ (Ed.). In Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde yeni yaklaşımlar-I (pp. 1-24). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Aktürk, V., Yazıcı, H. & Bulut, R. (2013). The effects of the use of animations and digital maps in social studies on students’ spatial perception skills. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 28, 1-17.

Ayva, Ö. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğrenme öğretme süreci ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 276-282.

Boyacı, A. (2012). Yapı ve süreçleri ile aile. In A. S. Türküm (Ed.), Anne baba eğitimi (pp. 23-49). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Burak, Y. & Ahmetoğlu, E. (2015). Study of effects of computer games on aggression level of children. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(11), 363-382.

Burz, H. L. & Marshall, K. (1998). Performance-based curriculum for social studies. California: Corwin press.

Chapin, J. R. (2006). Elementary social studies apractional guide (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Craft, A. (2003). Creative Thinking in the early years of education. Early Years, 23(2), 143– 54.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed.). United States of America: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. ve Plano Clark, V.L. (2014). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. (The original work was published in 2011.)

Çakmak, Z., & Taşkıran, C. (2015). Gains in the unit the journey through the turkish history in 7th grade social studies course and gagne’s learning outcomes. Pamukkale University Journal of Education (38), 181-190.

Çiftçi, O. (1991). Çocuğun sosyalleşmesinde ailenin rolü. Aile ve Toplum, 2(2), 19-22.

Dam, H. (2008). The family factor on the student’s success of school. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University, 7(14), 75-99.

Demir, P. (2015). Acording to revised Bloom’s taxonomy 2005 social science curriculum objectives and questions of high school entrance exam. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun.

Deveci, H. & Çengelci, T. (2008). A look to the media literacy by social studies teacher candidates. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 5(2), 25-43.

Doğanay, A. & Sarı, M. (2008). The new social studies curriculum from the teachers’ point of view: a study in the Adana province of turkey . Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 468-484.

Doğanay, A. (2006). Etkin vatandaşlık için düşünme becerilerinin öğretimi. In C. Öztürk (Ed.), Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi (pp. 179-218). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.

Gazel, A. A. & Erol, H. (2012). A taxonomic analysis of the intended learning outcomes of the primary school social studies curriculum for 7th graders. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(2), 202-222.

Gloria, A., & Afolabi, A. K. (2013). Effects of two puzzle-based instructional strategies on primary school pupils’ learning outcomes in social studies in Ondo State, Nigeria. African Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 58-63.

Gültekin, M. (2005). The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in the 5th grade social studies course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 548-556.

Gültekin, M., Gürdoğan Bayır, Ö., & Göz, N. L. (2004). New understandings in 2004 social studies curriculum: A study of differences of 1998 social studies curriculum. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(46), 24-49.

İlter, B. & Er, S. (2007). Viewpoints of parents and teachers on foreign language teaching at early childhood period. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(1), 21-30.

İnan, S. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi: nedir, ne zaman ve neden? In S. İnan (Ed.), Öğretmen ve öğretmen adayları için sosyal bilgiler eğitimine giriş kavramlar, yaklaşımlar, etkinlikler (pp.1-21). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Kabapınar, Y. (2009). İlköğretimde hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Ankara: Maya Akademi.

Kılıçoğlu, G. (2009). Sosyal bilgiler tanımı, dünyada ve ülkemizde gelişimi ve önemi. In M. Safran (Ed.), Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi (pp.3-15). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Maxim, G. W. (2006). Dynamic for social studies for constructivist classrooms inspiring tomorow’s social scientists. Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.

McCulley, L. V. & Osman, D. J. (2015). Effects of reading instruction on learning outcomes in social studies: A synthesis of quantitative research. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 183-195.

MEB (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.

Merryfield, M. M. & Remy, R. C. (1995). Teaching about international conflict and peace. Suny Press.

Mutluer, C. (2013). The views of social studies teachers about the skills contained in social studies (the example of İzmir Menemen) Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(7), 355-362.

Okta, E. (2008). The evaluation of 1998 and 2004 teaching programmes of social studies course based on teachers’ opinions in target/acquirement dimensions. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.

Özmen, H. (2004). Fen öğretiminde öğrenme teorileri ve teknoloji destekli yapılandırmacı öğrenme. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 100-111.

Öztürk, C. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler: toplumsal yaşama disiplinler arası bir bakış. In C. Öztürk (Ed.), Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi (pp. 21-50). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.

Parker, W. C. (2011). Social studies in elementary education. (14th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Shamsi, N. (2004). Modern teaching of social studies. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.

Stockard, J. W. (1995). Activities for elementary school social studies. Illinois: Waveland Press.

Taşkıran, C., Baş, K., & Bulut, B. (2016). The level of acqiıred social studies specific skills. The Journal of Social Sciences (2146-4561), 6(11), 1-19.

Tay, B., & Yıldırım, K. (2009). Parents’ views regarding the values aimed to be taught in social studies lessons. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1499-1542.

Yapıcı, M., & Demirdelen, C. (2007). Teachers’ views with regard to the primary 4th grade social sciences curriculum. Elementary Education Online, 6(2), 204-212.

Zarillo, J. J. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi ilke ve uygulamalar. (B. Tay & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. (The original work was published in 2012.)
How to Cite
Gürdoğan Bayır, Ömür. (2018). Problems and solutions in achieving learning outcomes of the 4th grade social studies curriculum. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları Ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 209-232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2018.010