Teacher views on the curriculum of elementary school third grade science course

DOI: 10.31704/ijocis.2018.004 This study has been carried out with the aim of evaluating the Curriculum of Elementary School Third Grade Science Course, which has been implemented for the first time in the academic year of 2014-2015, based on the views of teachers. The general screening model has been employed in the study. This research has been conducted with the participation of 36 classroom teachers, who have been determined via maximum variety sampling method from schools that are classified as high level, medium level, and low level in terms of their success. These semi-structured interviews have been audio-recorded with the permission of the teachers. Content analysis has been used in order to analyze the data, The results of the study suggest that the teachers in all three school levels have positive views on the curriculum. According to the teachers, the fact that the curriculum does not offer any activity examples on the teaching-learning process and students' workbook are what the curriculum lacks. Article History: Received Revised Accepted Online 06 March 2018 09 May 2018 30 May 2018 30 June 2018


Introduction
Today, there is a scientific and technological competition among countries.The countries that are aware of this situation consider science courses as the address to be placed near the top in this competition.Accordingly, they also review science education in schools and make radical innovations in science programs (Çepni & Çil, 2013).In other words, the countries wishing to take the lead in scientific and technological competition know that effective science education can only be achieved through well-prepared curricula.One of the most important indicators of an effective science education is the training of science literate individuals.In this respect, it has been aimed to educate science literate individuals primarily in the science programs that have been developed since 2005 in our country.Science literate individuals are defined in the science curriculum as "the ones who can research-inquire, make effective decisions, solve problems, communicate effectively and the ones who have self-confidence, are open to cooperation and are life-long learners with the awareness of sustainable development" (MEB, 2013).It is an irrefutable fact that the individuals who have these characteristics and who are science literate can find a place near the top in the science and technology race thanks to these qualities.
According to Fidan (1986), "all the activities planned to realize the objectives set out the curriculum design and the outlook of these in application constitutes the curriculum".Curriculum includes specific objectives, educational situations that enable achieving these goals, and test cases that show how well these goals have been achieved.
One of the most important ways to decide how effective a curriculum developed on the basis of the three values mentioned above in practice is to consult the opinions of teachers who are the practitioners of the program.When the literature is reviewed, it is observed that the majority of curriculum evaluation studies conducted in Turkey have also been performed based on teachers' opinions.The studies conducted by Yigit and Kurt (2002), Özdemir (2006), Aydın (2007), Şeker (2007), Kara (2008), Topal (2009), Boyacı (2010), Aybek and Aslan (2015) are some examples to this.This study also aimed to determine the effectiveness of the Primary School Third Grade Science Curriculum started to be implemented since 2014-2015 academic year based on teachers' views.
2013 Science Curriculum was developed as a reflection of 4 + 4 + 4 education system.The curriculum has been gradually implemented throughout the country since the 2013-2014 academic year.While the program started to be applied at the middle school level in 2013-2014 academic year beginning from the fifth grade, it started to be applied in 2014-2015 academic year at the primary school level from the third grade.
With the gradual introduction of the new Science Curriculum since 2013-2014 academic year, the Science and Technology Curriculum developed in 2005 was also gradually abolished.As it is seen from the name of the curricula, the name of the course "Science and Technology" has been changed to "Science" with the new curriculum.
The most important innovation that the new curriculum has brought in terms of science education is giving science lessons in the first years, beginning from the 3rd grade.In the previous curriculum, which was called Science and Technology developed in 2005, science lessons had been given in primary school starting from the 4th grade.So, with the new curriculum, students have started having science lessons one year before.Within the scope of the research, teachers were asked about their opinions on giving science lesson at 3rd grade level.It is believed that the opinions of teachers who are practitioners of this change are very valuable.These views will help provide a perspective on all dimensions of the curriculum, in other words, implicit, neglected, and extra curriculum dimensions apart from the formal applied curriculum.
In the 2013 Curriculum, as in every grade level, there are outcomes and topics at the level of 3rd grade, but there are no examples for the activities related to the outcomes and topics.In the Curriculum of Primary School 3rd Grade Science Course, there are no examples of activities aimed at the evaluation process that will show the whether goals have been achieved or not during teaching-learning process.The reason why there are no activity examples in the curriculum is that the teachers might have been expected to find appropriate activities taking the individual differences of students and environmental conditions into account both in the evaluation and teaching-learning process.However, in the 2005 Curriculum, there had been examples of activities that would guide teachers towards the teaching-learning process as well as the evaluation process.
In this context, although it is the teachers' responsibility to create activities for the teaching-learning or evaluation process, it may be helpful to include sample activities in the program in terms of guiding teachers in creating their own activity examples.In addition, it can be said that the teachers will need more assistance when considering the fact that teachers were not given a guidebook, which had been previously given with the 2005 curriculum, along with the 2013 curriculum regarding science course.Many studies on science curricula support this view.It has been determined that in the studies done by Gökçe (2006), Bayrak (2009), Topal (2009), Kılıç (2010) and Demirtaş (2012) teachers make use of the teacher's guidebook while applying the program.In this study, teachers who are the practitioners of this program were asked about their opinions.It is thought that the opinions of the teachers about the fact that the activity samples are not included in the primary school 3rd grade science curriculum is very important.Thus, it can be determined whether teachers need sample activities to guide them while preparing their activity examples or not.
In the research, the opinions of the teachers about the changes in the science education with the new curriculum, as well as the goals of the program, the content, the teaching-learning and evaluation processes, the duration of the lesson, the difficulties encountered while applying the program have been tried to be determined.The findings are expected to provide significant contributions in the course of the reorganization and development of the curriculum.
Within the scope of the research, teachers' views towards the curriculum were asked at the end of 2014-2015 academic year, when the program first started to be implemented at the 3rd grade level.In the study, it is thought that teachers' views on the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum and the problems they have encountered in practice in the first year implementation of the curriculum would provide important clues for the early decisions about the program.

Purpose of the Research
This research was carried out in order to evaluate the Primary School 3rd Grade Science Teaching Curriculum which was started to be implemented in 2014-2015 academic year in terms of acquisition, content, learning-teaching processes and evaluation dimensions based on teacher opinions.

Research Model
The study was a qualitative study conducted using general screening model.According to Karasar (2006), this model is a screening regime on the whole or the sample of the universe to arrive at a general judgement about the universe in an environment composed of a large number of elements.

Sampling
In the survey, primary schools located in Ankara province were divided into three groups as "upper level, middle level and lower level" in terms of achievement level.In order to determine upper, middle and lower level schools, the primary schools in the province of Ankara were ranked according to average the 2011 SBS (Level Placement Exam) scores.According to this ranking, the schools in the first 27% were upper level, the schools in the lower 27% were lower, and the rest was determined as first 27% and the lower 27% were medium level schools.In the study, the teachers who were interviewed were determined by maximum diversity sampling method which is one of the purposeful sampling methods.In the study, it was taken as basis for teachers to work in different schools in terms of success level in accordance with maximum diversity sampling method.Accordingly, a total of 36 classroom teachers, 12 of each of the school groups, were interviewed.Numerical data related to the demographic information of the interviewed teachers are presented in Table 1.Table 1.Numerical Data Related to Teachers' Demographic Information.

Data Collection Tool
A semi-structured interview form was prepared by the researcher in order to determine the opinions and suggestions of the teachers who are the practitioners of the 3rd grade science curriculum.The opinions of a total of 7 experts working as classroom teachers, curriculum development and assessment about the prepared draft interview form were obtained and necessary revisions were made in the interview form in line with the feedbacks.Harmonization among experts was calculated using the Krippendorff alpha technique.The calculated alpha value is 0.84.This value also indicates that there is a high level of compliance among the experts who were interviewed (Krippendorff, 2004).Moreover, in order to test the clarity and functioning of the questions in the prepared interview form, pre-application was carried out with 5 primary school 3rd grade teachers and it was determined that the teachers generally well understood the questions in the interview form.After the preliminary application, the interview form consisting of 12 questions was finalized.

Analysis of Data
The semi-structured interviews with teachers were recorded on a voice recorder upon their consents.Each interview recorded on the voice recorder was then transcribed by the researcher.Content analysis was performed on the transcript data.For this purpose, the obtained data was examined and the codes were first determined for each interview question, and then similar codes were put together to create themes.Teachers' views towards the curriculum were also described on the basis of the determined codes and themes and described data was interpreted in the light of these representations.Within the scope of the research, direct citation for each interview question was also included in order to reflect teachers' views on the curriculum.In addition, frequency and percentage calculations were done for each school group classified as upper, middle and lower level in terms of the determined code and the success level of the themes.
In order to determine the reliability of the codes generated by the researcher, the data obtained from the interview form was also coded by another researcher and the codes determined by both researchers were compared.The reliability between the codes determined by both researchers was calculated using the formula proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994) (Number of consensus unions / Consensus union + Number of consensus).Within the scope of this formula, the percentage of agreement between the two researchers or the identified codes was calculated as 0.88.According to Yıldırım and Şimşek (2011), it can be said that the reliability the interview data is sufficient when it is 70% and above (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2011).

Findings Being Informed About The Program
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "Did teachers have any information about the curriculum before the Curriculum of Primary School 3rd Grade Science Course was implemented?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 2.When Table 2 is reviewed; it seems that the vast majority of teachers did not have any information about the curriculum before the 3rd Grade Science Teaching Curriculum started to be implemented.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-8: (Teacher working at a school in the upper group as an achievement level): "...No information was given.When we started the curriculum program, seminar work, we would have the science lesson this year in the 3rd grade.Then we were informed.No prior information was given..." MT-4: (Teacher working in a middle school group as an achievement level): "...No, we did not know about the curriculum.We came in September.It was a surprise.They said you have a science class…" ST-2: (Teacher who works in a sub-group as an achievement level): "...I just downloaded the contents of the curriculum from the sites I followed on the internet and followed them by myself.In other words, I have the knowledge as a result of my own studies.Neither at the end of the 2nd year, nor at the beginning did I get any information..."

Teaching Science Course at the 3rd Grade
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the opinions of teachers about the teaching the Science course at the 3rd grade?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 3. Table 3 When Table 3 is reviewed; it is seen that in all three school groups, all of the teachers have positive views about giving science subjects in the third year of primary school.It was determined that 7 teachers working in the upper group; 8 teachers in the middle group and 9 teachers in the lower group thought that giving science courses in the 3rd grade primary school increased students' science knowledge.In addition, 8 teachers working in the upper group; 4 teachers in the middle group and 6 teachers in the sub-group found the 3rd grade science course as helpful since it prepares students for the 4th grade science course.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-7: "...Well; Very good in terms of being a preparation for the 4th grade in the 3rd year..." MT-12: "...In fact it's good that they were separated.Positive.There are so many topics in life science; as if I were in the science department, and it seemed to be useless in the meantime.Or it was very boring in the lesson of life science.It is good to separate science.It is more interesting for the children.Also, it seems to me that they felt they grew up since they took a separate science course..." ST-8: "...The present topics were not in the curriculum in the past years, for example, electricity topic or the structure of world.So I think it's good.Positive, because they used to meet with the topic for the first time in the 4th grade and it used to be harder.At least it is a step, as simple as they would understand.It's good.Positive, I think..."

Achievements of the Curriculum
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the views of teachers on their achievements in the curriculum of the 3rd grade primary science course?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 4.When Table 4 is examined, it is seen that 11 teachers in each of the three school group found the achievements appropriate for the level of the students.It was determined that 11 teachers working in the upper group and 10 teachers in the middle and lower groups thought that the achievements were appropriate for meaningful learning, meaning that the achievements were not in a fashion that led students to memorization.
Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-10: "...So achievements can be reached.We are a bit lucky as a school, having the laboratory but I do not know about other schools..." MT-9: "...The achievements are absolutely appropriate for the level.Absolutely appropriate, so we did not have any problems..." ST-1: "...I find it appropriate to learn meaningfully; not learning by heart..."

Topics covered in the program
The opinions obtained from the interviews conducted with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the opinions of teachers about the topics covered in the curriculum of the 3rd grade science course?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 5.Table 5 When Table 5 is examined; all of the teachers working in upper and middle group; and 10 teachers in the sub-group found the subjects in the curriculum related to daily life.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-7: "The achievements were perfectly equaled, that is, the topics are related to the achievements…" MT-9: "... Associated with everyday life.So it has the information that age group can use in daily life.So when you teach the children about the subject, they can give examples from their daily lives ..." ST-11: "...That is good for the level of my students.Suitable for grade 3. We have never had difficulty..."

The Lack of sample Activities in the Curriculum
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the views of teachers on the absence of sample activities for teaching-learning and assessment processes in the curriculum of the 3rd grade science course?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 6.When Table 6 is examined, 11 teachers working in the middle and lower groups and all teachers in the upper group think that the teachers should be provided with sample activities in the curriculum in terms of guidance.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-10: "...So it would have been better if there were.It could have been more guiding…" MT-11: "...So we see that; even if there is not, it could be.Because the teacher is doing it himself..." ST-7: "...It would be good if there were because it is easy for us.At least, it is an example in our hands..."

Adequacy of Activities Conducted in Teaching-Learning Process
The opinions obtained from the interviews with teachers on the interview question "What are the opinions of teachers on the adequacy level of the teaching-learning process they conducted in order to achieve the objectives of the program?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 7.
When Table 7 is reviewed, since the 4 teachers who work in the upper group relate the subjects to daily life, and 4 teachers who work in the middle group use visual materials in class, it can be seen that 5 teachers who work in the sub-group found the activities they had done during the teaching-learning process to be sufficient because they associated the subjects with daily life.In addition, it was determined that 1 teacher working in the upper group and 3 teachers in the lower group found the activities they had done during the teachinglearning process to be inadequate because the laboratory did not have sufficient equipment.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-9: "...I mostly assign the children group work.Here they worked in groups.Those children who were not willing to work then joined them..." MT-4: "...Repeating often, even the weakest student in general is much better, because you give enough space and time..." ST-4: "...It was more permanent in children when I taught visually.They liked more and more..."

Preferred Assessment Tools
The opinions obtained from the interviews with teachers regarding the interview question "What are the opinions of the teachers about the assessment tools they prefer to determine achievements of the objectives of the curriculum?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 8.When Table 8 is examined; it is seen that 8 teachers working in the upper group, 9 teachers who worked in the middle group and the sub group preferred the multiple choice test.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-4: "...There is a file that every student has put in all the work s/he has done, and I think this file gives enough information about what the learner has learned..."

MT-8: "...At the end of each topic, I distribute the work sheets related to that subject to the students and I have an idea about how much the students have learned according to their work sheets..."
ST-12: "...I usually prepare and administer multiple-choice tests consisting of ten questions to the students..."

Duration of the Course
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the opinions of teachers on the duration of the primary school 3rd grade science course?" and the frequency distributions related to these views are presented in Table 9.The time given for the course must be reduced -2 1 3 The time given for the course should be increased 1 3 2 6 When the Table 9 is reviewed it can be seen that 11 teachers working in the upper group, 7 teachers in the middle group and 9 teachers in the lower group found the time allocated for the 3rd grade science courses in primary school as sufficient.
Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-7: "...Enough, that is enough for the subjects.So 3 hours is really nice for the topics…" MT-7: "...Time is enough.So these subjects match up with these achievements..." ST-4: "...I now say that I finished the units earlier.The duration should be reduced now.For example, it would be much better if it was given to Math instead..."

Difficulties Encountered While Applying The Program
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the views of the teachers about the difficulties they experienced when applying the Curriculum of Primary School Science Course, which was first implemented in the 2014-2015 year?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 10.

Strengths of The Curriculum
The opinions obtained from the interviews with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the views of the teachers on the strengths of the curriculum for the 3rd Grade Science Course in primary school?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 11

Weaknesses of the Curriculum
The opinions obtained from the interviews carried out with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the views of teachers on the weaknesses of the Curriculum for the 3rd grade Science Class in Primary School ?" and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 12.When Table 12 is reviewed, 7 teachers working in the upper group, 6 teachers who work in the middle group and in the sub-group determined the lack of sample activities as one of the weaknesses of the curriculum.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: UT-3: "...Weak due to lack of a study book for students…" MT-2: "...The school equipment is not fully equipped..." ST-10: "...There are not any samples, we tried to complete it ourselves.There had to be some activities, it would have been much better.They are missing..."

Suggestions Regarding the Curriculum
The opinions obtained from the interviews conducted with the teachers regarding the interview question "What are the recommendations of the teachers for the development of the curriculum of the 3rd grade science course at the end of their implementations?"and the frequency distributions related to these opinions are presented in Table 13.ST-11: "...I do not think that the resources in the school that is the resources in the laboratory are adequate.The materials for primary schools should be further developed by the ministry; I think it will be funnier and more efficient for children to learn the lessons…"

Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations
When the findings obtained within the scope of the research were examined, it was determined that no information was given to the teachers about the Science Curriculum, to be implemented for the first time at the third grade before its nation-wide implementation.Demirtaş, Arslan, Yarar and Tutkun (2015) also found similar results about the curriculum of the 5th grade science course implemented for the first time in the 2013-2014 academic year.The teachers participated in their study stated that they were not informed about the curriculum.Teachers who are not informed about the curriculum are likely to encounter problems in the process of applying a curriculum which will be implemented in that specific year for the first time.Many studies on science curricula support this view.Studies conducted by Savran, Çakıroğlu and Özkan (2002), Akpınar, Günay and Hamurcu (2005), Öz (2007), Şeker, (2007), Yangın (2007), Kara (2008), Tekbıyık and Akdeniz (2008) and Unayağyol (2009) also revealed that one of the main problems teachers faced during the implementation of science curricula was not being adequately informed about the curriculum.
Another important finding of the research is that in all three school groups, all of the teachers' find it positive that science subjects should be given as a separate course under the name of Science at the 3rd grade level.Similar findings have been obtained in many studies related to this topic in the field.Aybek and Aslan (2015), Çalışoğlu, Tortum, Erişmiş and Koçyiğit. (2015), Çiftçi, Saban, Gündüz and Olaç (2015), Ünişen and Kaya (2015) and Yıldırım and Güngör Akgün (2015) found that teachers were positive about giving science courses at the third grade level.In the first year of the Science Course, which was first offered in the 2014-2015 academic year, administering the science course at the 3rd grade can be interpreted as a positive step for the primary school science education depending on the teachers' views who are the practitioners of the curriculum.Teachers whose opinions were asked stated that the science course given in the 3rd grade increased the students' knowledge of science.In other words, the teachers think that in the 3rd grade science course, students are more interested in science than Life Science course.The study done by Topal (2009) supports this view.Topal's study (2009), classroom teachers stated that the students' knowledge of science subjects in science lessons is higher than that of science subjects in life science lessons.In addition, the teachers again stated that the students of the 3rd grade Science Course are prepared for the 4th grade Science Course.In other words, the teachers thought that the third grade science course better prepared students for the fourth grade science course than the life science course did.The studies done by Demir (2006) and Topal (2009) also support this view.In Demir's (2006) study, it was determined that classroom teachers found that they did not have enough life science lessons to prepare students for science classes.According to classroom teachers in Topal's study (2009), life science course partly prepared students for the science course.
Another finding that draws attention about the results of the research is that, majority of teachers think that there should be example activities in the curriculum as a guide for the teachers.Teachers think that giving example activities in the curriculum will help them to plan teaching-learning and evaluation processes.In the science course applied for the first time in 2014-2015 academic year, when it is thought that teachers were not informed about the program and the teacher guidebooks were not given for the lessons; it may be fairly natural that teachers want to example activities to be included in the curriculum.The reason why the teachers request activity samples in the curriculum may be the involvement of such activities in the previous '2005 Science and Technology Course Curriculum for teachers because the studies conducted by Doğan (2009) and Kurtuluş and Çavdar (2011) on the 2005 curriculum show that teachers have positive thoughts about the example activities in the curriculum.In the study conducted by Doğan (2009), it was determined that the teachers have largely adopted and tried to apply the activities provided with the curriculum.Kurtuluş and Çavdar (2011) also revealed that the teachers found the activities in the curriculum as interesting and helpful for permanent learning.
Teachers generally point out that the program is overall positive but have some deficiencies.Teachers view the lack of activity samples as one of the missing aspects of the program.Teachers view the absence of a student workbook, which can be instead used as a way to reinforce what students learn, is another missing element of the curriuculum.Similar findings have been found in many studies on the Science Curriculum.Regarding the 3rd grade science curriculum, Çalışoğlu et al. (2015Çalışoğlu et al. ( ), Farmer et al. (2015) ) and Yıldırım and Güngör Akgün (2015) and regarding the 5th grade science curriculum Demirtaş et al. (2015) found that the teachers considered the absence of student workbooks as an important deficiency about the curriculum.In addition, as a success level, especially the teachers working in the middle and lower group schools stated that the weakness of the curriculum is due to the lack of equipment at schools.Similar findings have been obtained in many studies on science curricula.It was determined that the teachers considered the lack of equipment at schools as a negative feature of the curriculum in the studies conducted by Özdemir (2006), Şeker (2007), Kara (2008) and Boyaci (2010).When the literature on science courses is examined, it is seen that one of the main problems faced by teachers in the implementation of science curricula is the lack of equipment at schools.The studies conducted by Akdeniz et al. (2002), Savran et al. (2002), Öz (2007), Erdem (2009), Unayağyol (2009), Demirtaş (2012), Aybek and Aslan (2015) and Çalışoğlu et al. (2015), Çiftçi et al. (2015) and Yıldırım and Güngör Akgün (2015) have revealed findings supporting this view.
On the basis of the results obtained in the research, it might be possible to suggest that the teachers who were not informed about the Curriculum of the 3rd Grade Science Course, should be provided with in-service training seminars and/or courses.Other suggestions based on the findings of the study could be the inclusion of sample activities towards teaching-learning and assessment processes, preparation of a guidebook for teachers when they apply the curriculum and preparation of a workbook that could help students reinforce what they have learned in the 3rd grade science course.Final suggestion that can be made in the direction of the opinions of the teachers working in the middle and lower group schools is that their opinions about the tools they need in science courses can be obtained and the necessary tools and materials could be send to the school laboratories to make them sufficient enough for the science courses.

Table 2 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Views on Information about the Curriculum.

.
Frequency Distribution of Opinions of Teachers about teaching Science Course in Grade 3 at Primary School.

.
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions about the Topics in the Program.

Table 6 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions about Lack of Sample Activities in the Curriculum.

Table 7 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions on the Sufficiency of Activities Performed in the Teaching-LearningProcess.

Table 8 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions about Assessment Tools They Prefer.

Table 9 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions about Course Duration.

Table 10 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Opinions on whether They Had any Difficulties While Applying the Curriculum.
UT-7: "...We had nothing with our guidebook.It's also difficult because we do not have a guide book…" MT-3: "...It would be easier if we had our guide book…" ST-11: "...I never had difficulty.Not such an extra work, did not bring a load, did not have difficulty..."

Table 11 .
. Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Views on the Strengths of the Curriculum.When Table11is reviewed, 7 teachers working in the upper group, 8 teachers working in the middle group and 6 teachers working in the sub-group regarded the program to be related to daily life as one of the strengths of the program.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: "...So the science is more about the kitchen in your home.It's my pleasure to go to the program because it's about what we see around.So it's about the child's life.For example; Here is the water.The child is living in it, he sees it in the kitchen, he sees electric vehicles at home.I mean, it's so nice that it's about the child's life...
UT-9: " MT-3: "...It was suitable for the level of the children, I think the strongest side was it..." ST-8: "...I had some concerns when I first heard about science course at the 3rd grade, how could be taught at the level of the 3rd grade, but they have simplified things very intensely.So it's good.It is a preparation for 4th grade…"

Table 12 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Views on the Weaknesses of the Curriculum.

Table 13 .
Frequency Distribution of Teachers' Suggestions Related to Curriculum.When Table13is reviewed; 8 teachers who work in the upper group and the middle group and 7 teachers who work in the lower group recommend that there should be activity examples in the curriculum.Some of the teachers' views on this question are as follows: "...Will be much more successful if activities are placed..."MT-2: "...If the workbook and the teacher's guidebook are given to you by the Ministry of National Education; I believe there will be much more success in science class…" UT-12: